I am not going to take your attacks sitting down anymore. I am going to post one article for every single article you tagged my name in. What is good for the goose is good for the gander, right? Whatever information I find about you, I am going to post publicly.
http://www.myinterwebz.net/2012/03/01/carolyn-ann-2/It's so cool! Dana's decided she has a vendetta against me! I'm so excited! Ooh!
Don't forget the popcorn. You won't need sleeping aids. It all promises to be sophomoric... Wait. Is that it? Oh, sorry. It promises to be soporific!
...
Oh fer fucks sake, Dana. Grow up. Put on your big girl panties and fuckin' grow up.
===
Should I be worried?
I'm concerned she'll drop by with a gun. Seriously - I am!
Personal criticism is one thing; a weapon is quite another! Seriously. I'm worried about that.
It's one thing to criticize someone, even as relentlessly as I've criticized Dana. She's said some odious things, and I've gone after her on the basis of those statements. I've also gone after her for things she's said about me; there's no evidence, of course - she's erased at least two blogs since then. In all of it, she's not displayed much affection for "truth" or "honesty" and, quite frankly, I'm a trifle concerned. She's definitely straying into dangerous territory; it's not much of a leap from her paranoia to my staring at the wrong end of a pistol. (Something I've done before, and not an experience I'd like to repeat.)
I'll be keeping logs of all her visits to this blog, and I'll be making screen captures of all the things she writes about me. I don't feel inclined to answer her; more of a "let her have her say and be done" sort of thing. After all, she can't harm me with words. But with her call for information, she's probably shaking the contact tree and it won't be long before she knows where I live. She'll publish that, and any other information she gets. She won't bother checking it for honesty or facts; she'll just publish. I trust her on that!
There's not a lot I can do, to be honest. I've already said I'm backing off criticizing her; that sort of anger isn't worth the danger she poses. If she gets too creepy I could go to the police or the FBI (don't think I won't!) But where does it get "too creepy"?
Oh well. There's not a lot I can do. She'll do what she will, make an ass of herself and I'll go about my life as I've always done. I've faced down bullies before, I'll do so again. I just hope she realizes that going after someone as she's proposing to can get her into more trouble than it's worth. She's asking for people to tattle-tale on me! Like it's a high school playground or something. But those places are dangerous, and I'm inclined to think that woman is Very Dangerous.
Christ on a candlestick. When I fuck up, I really fuck up. And I fucked up but good this time!
Perhaps I should contact the University of Pennsylvania police? (I'll leave that decision until such a time I can definitively say she's stalking me.)
On the other hand, Angel dropped in with some welcome words. Both Dana and I would be wise to abide them.
Carolyn Ann
Both of you.....
ReplyDeleteLook what you've done
Aww. Poor bunny! Sorry, bunny!
ReplyDeleteA voice of reason in the wilderness. Thanks, Angel. :-)
LOL...you are trying to tell your followers that I pose a threat to your physical safety. What hogwash. I have never said anything violent against you. This is one of the silliest things you have sad to date. Believe me, I hate violence with a passion. I would only resort to violence in self defense.
ReplyDeleteDeena left a good comment on my blog and she is right. There is no arguing with a man. So, for now, I am going to go about my business.
What? I can't voice my concerns? Yes I am concerned about violence from you.
DeleteI have a question. I'm curious, do you consider yourself a crossdresser, transvestite, or ?? It is very obvious that you are a man in a dress and you even refer to yourself as such at the top of this page. I ask this because as a man in a dress, how could you really know or understand anything that transexuals go through? I say this because I have read some of your blogs and you argue, or disagree with Dana and others over the points that they are trying to make. I would also like to know, are you Native American? I read your comment on "Relabel yourself" about the Two Spirit article and how you said that the term came about in the 90's. I am Cherokee and I can tell you that the Cherokee consider transexuals special to the Creator because they are of both worlds, ( male and female ), and they are accepting of transexuals.
ReplyDeleteCan I point you to the thingy over on the left? It says, and I quote,
Delete"Because it crops up so often, I have decided to put it on the blog: the tagline/subheading/whatever-you-want-to-call-it is sardonic. :-)"
So I leave it to you to figure out what I am. Because, if you did read this blog, you'd know the answer already. :-) For instance, you'd know that defining people so narrowly, with such restrictive covenants, isn't something I'm particularly fond of. People are more than the labels the simple-minded attach to them. Wouldn't you agree? :-)
And I'm British. If you read this blog, you'd know that too.
I'm not about to re-litigate the whole two-spirit thing. I stand by my words.
Can I also point out that I'm rather antagonistic toward arguments about deities? Especially when those arguments demand specialness of any sort. If you want a theological argument, you might want to go somewhere else. I'm not known for being nice when it comes to "creators" and all those desperate fuck-ups.
I was trying to get a straight answer from you. I know exactly what you are! Yes I picked up on the fact that you seem to be of British heritage. . You seem to have missed the point of the questions that I asked as well as missing the point of the Two Spirit statement. Although everyone is entitled to their own opinion; I was trying to be polite and diplomatic in my questions and statements , trying to find out why you would think that you have the knowledge or expertise to be argumentative over these issues; to the point that you tell others that they are wrong. However, you also seemed to have missed that as well. The whole point was that you don't have the knowledge that is needed on these subjects to be considered legitimate in your arguments. As a crossdresser you should be aware, more so than some, that spreading half true statements and false statements can be very damaging. My point; 1: You are a crossdresser, you are a man that puts on a skirt or dress when the urge hits you and for a couple of days pretend to be a woman. You have no personal knowledge and certainly no expertise of what transexual people go through. My point; 2: You are of British decent, not Native American. You have absolutely no knowledge or expertise of our heritage or our customs.
DeleteNo you weren't being polite and diplomatic. You were a tad adversarial.
DeletePerhaps I couldn't penetrate the subtlety of your questions? :-)
Thanks for defining me. I love it when people do that. Talk about half-right /half-wrong! You're not even half right. The simple fact is I don't have to define myself for you. I don't even have to define myself for myself! Why do you feel the need to label me and then immediately use that label to disparage me?
Believe me, I have no interest in labeling you. So why do you have an interest in labeling me? Or anyone else for that matter? What's wrong with "Hmm, he's figured out a way to handle his gender issues. I wish him well with it"? Because, quite frankly, they're none of your business.
And who said I don't know anything about transsexuals and what they go through? Oh I know you don't think I do, but that's because you're not thinking about my words and points. You're doing what so many others do: start at a point that conforms to your expectations and figure out how to make the "facts" fit whatever preconceptions you (need to?) have about me.
Now ask me if I care what you think of me. I don't know who you are, so why should I care? And why are you so eager to label me and pop me into a silly little box you've defined. Think outside the box. It's more refreshing and lets others be silly things like "people" with "humanity".
Why should my heritage have anything to do with arguing about a stupid religious belief? Considering that I think *all* religion to be silly nonsense, why should I even care what about the ins and outs of a particular belief?
According to your argument, I'd need to understand Catholicism before I could argue against it. Or Islam. Or whatever. I don't. I can, and do, argue against the underpinnings of all religious expression by concentrating on the fundamentals. You know, things like "creators", deities", "mother earth", "God" and all that silliness. It's all nonsense; why do I need to understand it?
Anyway, if you actually followed my argument, I was arguing against a political point, not a religious one. If memory serves, I pretty much ignored any precious piety and concentrated on freedom of expression.
Something so many desire for themselves as they seek to deny it for others. Wouldn't you agree?
I didn't define you as anything . I simply used what you wrote about yourself when you asked if I knew. Personally I could care less what clothes you do or don't wear, or where you are from. That's your problem. Are you transexual? If not , then how would you or anyone else know what a transexual person goes through on a daily basis. That would be like a man saying I know what giving birth to a child is like, there is no way you can possibly know unless you are in their shoes. It doesn't matter if you believe in God or if you believe in anything at all, the point was , you , not me, or anyone else, said that they were wrong in the two spirit because that didn't happen until the 90's. I'm telling you that you are full of it, because our heritage teaches us that transexuals were not only accepted but were refered to as being of both worlds, ( male and female ) accepted in the tribes since the beginning of history. Again, how could you possibly know about the subject of what Native Americans do or don't do , unless your heritage was Native American. I'm telling you that before you print a bunch of bull , you should get the facts straight. If asking you what you thought of yourself was adversial , I'm guilty. Telling you get get your facts right before you try telling others that they are wrong, that's just common sense.
Delete" It is very obvious that you are a man in a dress" That's defining me. If it isn't, what is it? Especially as this question comes up so often I put a little bit of text about it in the sidebar of my blog! I like the juxtaposition and the tweaking of expectations.
DeleteAs for the two-spirit thing, I think you're conflating your point about it to what was being argued. I understand your point; I also think you're missing a different one. I *know* the two-spirit thing has been around for a heck of a long time within (some?) Native American cultures. The original argument was, if memory serves - it's been a long time - about a modern, trendy interpretation of the concept. And, if memory still serves, it was about fashion not religion, although I think someone did try to introduce that into the whole thing.
You're wrong on the comparison. I don't know what it's like to give birth; I'll never know. But how do you know my life so well? How do you know that, in almost 50 years on this planet, I haven't looked at the various options available to me? You're right that I don't know individual lives; I've never claimed to. But how are you so certain about my gender and my battles with it? Hells bells, I've never claimed to be certain about my own gender - so it baffles me how you can be so certain of it.
I live with what I have, if you really want to be nosy. I live with what nature provided and whether I'm happy about that or not is none of your damn business. It's mine and mine alone. Why I choose not to do something others think is right for them is a well-explored course; it's not one I care to reiterate and it's not one that's any of your goddamn business. I made the decision to pursue my life as I saw fit and not as others require me to almost 40 years ago. Why should I fit with *your* expectations? Live and let live and simply be amazed at the wondrous diversity of people. It's more interesting and a heck of a lot more fun.
Satisfied? That answer your questions? That make you happier about *my* decisions, *my* life?
Your so busy trying to define me you forget that it's not your life to define. It's mine. I play with words and concepts for a hobby; so sue me! It's not my problem you fail to appreciate the sardonic irony of my tagline. It's yours.
If you want to critique my life, my decisions any further, please: feel free.
For your edification, and education, Angela.
Deletehttp://carolyn-ann.blogspot.com/2012/03/permit-me-some-reiteration.html
Ok.
DeleteWOW
You are really hung up on the defining thing.
Let me break down YOUR profile for you .
This is what YOU put on here about YOURSELF.
The pic the you have on here , clearly appears to be a man in a dress , complete with the 5 o'clock shadow.
Follow me so far?
YOU write that YOU are a man in a dress.
You say that YOU don't want to change your body.
YOU write that YOU are in fact happy with YOUR body as it has served you well.
YOU wrote all of that , NOT me.
YOU defined YOURSELF to everyone who reads your articles.
Since YOU do not want to go through the process that most transexuals go through , how could YOU possibly know what they have to deal with , or go through on a daily basis?
YOU CAN'T KNOW , because YOU aren't going through it.
Thats logic, not opinion.
As I said before , I COULD CARE LESS ABOUT WHAT YOU DO OR DON'T WEAR , OR IF YOU WEAR ANYTHING AT ALL.
THAT'S YOUR PROBLEM.
What I do care about is all the mis-information , half truths and down right wrong information that is spread over the internet from people who don't have all the facts, or , who refuse to get all the facts before they write something.
People have a tendency to believe things they read on the internet , if you write something that is wrong, or half wrong, and filled with bull , it spreads like a disease.
Follow me?
Life is hard enough , especially for transexual people.
I don't give a shit if you believe in anything.
Just get the facts right.
This comment has been removed by the author.
DeleteOkay... That was a trifle harsh.
DeleteAngela, I'm real glad I don't fit into your silly little box, your contrite blinkered definition. Oh, you think I do, but is that important to me? No, not at all. I don't know you; to me, you're just a name with a silly point to prove.
I must admit I wasn't aware that I needed to be in a pissing contest for whom has the hardest life. Believe me when I tell you it ain't a bed of wine and roses being a transgendered person, either. But you don't care about that, do you? No, you care only about how hard life is for some folk. You think I don't know that life is a tad challenging at times? Fuck ya on that me old China.
You know almost nothing about me. And yet you're keen on passing a verdict that fits your preconceived notions. Tell me - why should I pay the blindest bit of attention to you?
YOU STILL CAN'T GET IT!!!
DeleteCALL YOURSELF WHATEVER YOU WANT.
I DON'T CARE WHERE YOU FIT , WHAT YOU CALL YOURSELF , WHAT YOU WEAR OR HOW YOU WEAR IT!!!
What I keep trying to get through to you is that , UNLESS YOU HAVE FIRSTHAND KNOWLEDGE OF SOMETHING, HAVE EXPEIRENCED IT , HAVE RESEARCHED IT AND GATHERED ALL OF THE INFORMATION NEEDED TO OFFER A VALID ARGUMENT ON A SUBJECT , YOU CANNOT TELL ANYONE THAT THEIR OPINION IS WRONG!!!
THAT IS ONLY LOGICAL.
This discussion wasn't about how hard your personal life is or was , or mine either.
Life is hard for most people.
Even harder with the wrong information about things.
What I care about is all the mis-information , half truths and down right wrong information that is spread over the internet from people who don't have all the facts, or , who refuse to get all the facts before they write something.
People have a tendency to believe things they read on the internet , if you write something that is wrong, or half wrong, and filled with bull , it spreads like a disease.
Follow me?
I don't give a shit if you believe in anything.
Just get the facts right.
Ah. *now* you explain yourself. See - you should have been clearer.
DeleteAs I said, I don't need to experience the full scope of life to offer an opinion. I don't, for instance, need to experience or research abortion to know that I support a woman's right to choose. With one example I've destroyed your argument.
What "facts" do I need to understand? That you think of two-spirit stuff in a different way to me? That you respect the religious reasoning behind it and I couldn't give a toss about such nonsense? That the transsexual woman has a harder time than most? I know that. I don't need to research it; I've been a student of human nature for most of my years. I didn't need much more than that to tell me transsexual women often have a hard time of it.
I can tell you religion is idiotic. I've not researched it; I don't need to. All I needed to do was think about it. Didn't take much thinking, either.
So far you're giving me nothing to work with. Facts? Are you debating the nature of facts? Or are you're arguing about "truth"? If you want a debate about that, let me know. I know something about "truth". Or are you simply arguing that I need to agree with you on something you're not even clear about yourself?
Well, which is it?
WOW.
DeleteWe aren't talking about abortion.
But since you want to take it there, how could you present a legitimate argument on abortion , pro or con , without facts to back up what you say .
You can't .
It would simply be your opinion , and everyone is entitled to an opinion.
We were talking about how you have argued with people and basicaly told them they were wrong.
Without the facts to support your theory.
For example ,
how can you tell Dana that her way of thinking is wrong?
Do you have anything to support this?
Where are your facts?
Is it just your opinion?
I wasn't talking religion with you.
I said that you were wrong about the Two-Spirit not being around before the 90's.
Again where are your facts ?
I know for a fact that it was around way before that!!
I didn't insult whatever it is that you believe in ,
the fact is ,
I don't care what you believe in.
So don't insult what I believe in by calling it idiotic!!
As far as you not giving it much thought , that is also pretty obvious.
Buy saying that ,
you ,
once again ,
have proven might point ,
that nothing you say has a factual basis , it is merely your opinion.
You're quite literal, aren't you?
DeleteI used abortion as an example, a straw man to destroy your argument. I think I did that rather successfully. :-)
(You're not that careful a reader, either. Didn't I say that the whole two-spirit thing had been around a lot longer? Didn't I clarify my intention with that assertion? Oh, yeah I did. A couple of comments ago.)
Ah. You want me to agree to something you're not actually clear about.
That's not something I'm willing to do.
And you want an agreement on what a fact is! Which is a bit difficult, because you haven't defined what one of those is. I strongly suspect you're confusing "truth", more specifically your truth, with a universal definition for "fact".
Whatever you do, don't go into politics. You'd last about 5 minutes. That's an opinion. If I'd said you're not being clear, I'd be stating a fact.
Yup. I've said people are wrong. So what?
Is there a law against that? Some folk have said I'm wrong, too. I don't get how they arrive at that conclusion, but there you go! Heck, I believe even you've told me that. Go figure!
I deal in ideas. I write about people and their ideas. There are no facts beyond names, ages and so on. There are no absolute truths, none of that sort of thing. It's all ideas, opinions and word play. I have a habit of using people's words against them; I deconstruct their ideas and words, notice the holes, the discrimination and the inconsistencies, and I write about those. You want facts when there is only opinion.
Why should I justify anything about a person whom I believe is now stalking me? I've made my case; if you need literal guides to my thinking, I suggest you write them yourself. I ain't gonna. I stand by my words and ideas. And I don't stalk folk because they disagree with me. (I think that's quite an important point. Don't you?)
And yes, I do call religion and religious belief idiotic. What gives you the right to dictate that I not state an opinion you find offensive?
What gives you the right to demand that I indulge your fantasies of how much thought you might need to realize religion is a stupid fantasy? I'll let you in on a secret (well, it's not really secret): I became an atheist when I was 5 years old. I've been one ever since.
Ok.
DeleteYou haven't destroyed anything , except the FACT that , originally , I thought you were an intellegent person that I could ask questions and get an intelligent answers from .
Instead I got the runaround and YOU insult my beliefs.
I guess that makes you feel like the big man on the block.
Let me dumb this down for you.
Since you can't seem to grasp the concept.
When a person , ANY , person writes or speaks on a regular basis , they present their opinions and ideas to others , to make their opinions and ideas a valid argument , on ANY topic , requires some sort of factual basis ,
OTHERWISE IT IS PURE SPECULATION ON THE PART OF THE SPEAKER OR WRITER.
IT IS MERELY AN OPINION OF ONE PERSON WITH NO EVIDENCE OR BASIS OF SUPPORT THAT WOULD CONVEY ANY MESSAGE WITH REAL MEANING TO ANYONE ELSE.
FACT (COMP 101 ).
You are entitled to your opinions ,
just like anyone else is.
I never said that you weren't!!
And , yes , you did admit that it had been around longer ,
AFTER I CALLED YOU OUT ON IT!!
That's the point , you present an argument on YOUR opinions , then proceed to argue the fact that everyone else is wrong , if they disagree with your opinion.
Why are they wrong?
What makes them wrong and not you?
What proof do you have that they are wrong?
What facts do you have to support YOUR argument?
There are absolute truths!!
The sun is in the sky.
FACT.
I say that I am Cherokee.
Truth , I have the FACTS to prove it.
You say that YOU are transgender.
FACT.
I believe you.
If I said the moon is purple , that is not a fact.
If I said that in my opinion the moon is purple ,
that would be a FACT.
That would be my opinion.
It's not the FACT that you say people are wrong.
It is the Fact that, you will have at least one full page argument , of them being wrong ,
then YOU present ABSOLUTELY NOTHING to support why they are so wrong!!
YOU deal in ideals , good for you.
However you can't offer anything to support why anyone else should believe them , or , can believe them.
YOU deal in half truths, and mis-information , proven by your lack of providing anything that would support YOUR claims.
I love to read about a good debate between people who can support their claims with some sort of evidence.
It seems to me , that you said something similar to Dana , a couple of times.
I have already told you several times
I DON'T CARE WHAT YOU BELIEVE IN!!!
I WASN'T EVEN TALKING ABOUT RELIGION , YOU WENT THERE.
ALL I DID WAS SUPPORT MY STATEMENT WITH FACTS.
WHICH IS OBVIOUSLY SOMETHING THAT YOU CANNOT DO.
HOWEVER , NOTHING , GIVES YOU THE RIGHT TO BELITTLE MY BELIEFS TO ME , NOTHING!!!
IF YOU WANT TO MAKE YOURSELF BIG MAN ON THE BLOCK BY BELITTLING MY BELIEFS , GO FOR IT , I CAN'T STOP YOU.
HOWEVER ABSOLUTELY NOTHING GIVES YOU THAT RIGHT.
BUT IF IT MAKES YOU FEEL BETTER , GO FOR IT.
To a lot of people that would just show how immature you are.
Like I said, you're confusing *your* opinions for facts.
DeleteGo read my words on whatever topic you want; I've already said I'm not going to revisit old arguments. If those don't answer your questions, tough tiddlywinks. Or, alternatively, ask specific questions. Not generalized "let me see if I can prove my case" crap.
You've proven you can't spell. You've proven you're belligerent. You've proven that you don't know a fact from an opinion. ... Tell me why I should be bothered answering any more of your rants? I've shown you the tools. It's up to you to figure out how to use them.
If I'm inclined I'll go through your latest rant tomorrow. Right now I'm more interested in petting the cat sitting next to me. He's a lot more cheerful than you and he's fun to be around. Why don't you head back to that Pity Party and whine about how nasty I am? Or did they send you over in the first place? I'll give you credit, you tried. None of those miseries ever will, I'll guarantee that! They clearly prefer sniping from a distance, lest they be sullied by actual engagement with my disdain. So you've got a head start on them.
Disagree with me, agree with me. I couldn't care less. My arguments are valid; that you can't understand them is neither here nor there to me. Your opinion of me is irrelevant to me; I'm sure, I hope, my opinion of you is just as irrelevant to you. I'm not the one yelling in misspelled caps; you are.
Please, don't tell me what I can or can't do. Especially on my blog. Your religious beliefs are meaningless to me. You have not earned my respect and you certainly have not gained any right to tell me what I can or cannot ridicule. It just irritates me. If you want to issue orders to me, you go right ahead. It's your right to do so. It's my right to tell you to go stuff those orders where the sun don't shine.
So now you've got something to work with. Go figure out what I was saying. Think about it. And then ask me *specific* questions. If you're not okay with that, I'm not going to lose any sleep. And you have no option but to accept the fact that I really couldn't care less if I your religious beliefs were ridiculed in any way. Unless you really want to persuade me that you've got a valid case? In which case, figure out my arguments (they're not complicated; I'm a simple chap) and address them and their underlying philosophy. Heck, take apart the deconstructive technique I use to parse arguments. Whatever rocks your boat.
But don't expect me to consider you worth responding to if you continue to rant and insist upon telling me what I can or cannot say on this blog. On your blog, fine - you get to make the rules. On this blog? I make the rules.
If you can't abide these requests, rant away. I'm more than happy to ignore you.
And now I'm going to pet a cat. G'night. Sleep well. :-) (Seriously, sleep well.)
PROVE THAT YOUR ARGUMENTS ARE SOUND!!!
DeleteWhy are you right and Dana is wrong?
You havn't produced one shred of anything to show anyone that reads your articles
why they should believe a word you say!!
You are right and everyone else is wrong , WHY?
Just because you say so!!
You can't prove anything that you say is more than fictional writing.
The ramblings of an air head.
So you attack my grammar ,which by the way is fine.
You attack my culture.
You are no better than a grade school bully at best.
A wanna be tough guy.
Have fun with that.
You're a real piece of work, Angela.
DeleteI don't know your culture. How the hell can I attack it if I have no knowledge of it! You tell me you're one thing; how can I know? You're an angry voice on the web, popping up and yelling at me. You make inarticulate demands and then scream that I'm not answering - and I've already told you what I'll answer. You want me to do your work for you.
You're as irrational as those you seek to defend.
you know , actually i have not seen her defending anyone . but she has asked you 9 direct questions that i saw and you have not answered a single 1. and you did attack her cherokee heritage, culture . i believe you called it idiotic.i am a crossdresser myself and i am curious why you can not just answer her.
DeleteI called her religion idiotic. I call *all* religion idiotic. Why should I change my opinion of religion? So that one believer can stay un-offended? Why should I consider one religion more worthy than any other? Because it's ancient? Or of the land? Or it's important to someone? In a nutshell: fuck that.
DeleteIf I adhered to that rule I'd be acknowledging that the ability to offend is meaningless, that freedom of expression is meaningless if someone might be offended. Freedom of expression is important and if someone is offended by my opinion, how is it my problem? I'm offended she wants me to consider her beliefs too important to be criticized. How about that?
The quantity of questions is irrelevant. What she's asked is the same loaded, vague, question time and again. She wants me to justify arguments I've made in the past, when all she has to do is read my blog. She's also confused "opinion" with "fact"; as in she gets to decide what's a fact and I don't. To which I say: bullshit.
If she wants to ask a specific question, fine. I'll decide then if I want to answer her. Until then, my words about Dana's various arguments stand on their own two feet. I don't work for Angela or you, and you don't get to dictate how I should spend my time. I don't want to go through old posts, trying to figure out if this or that fits Angela's vague question. She can do the work if she wants the answers.
Why do you mention you're a crossdresser? Am I supposed to care? It's an irrelevant detail. What you want to wear is of no interest to me or the question; I'd have answered the same way regardless of what you want to wear. That's the difference between DLT and me. <- And that is the answer to Angela's question, by the way. :-D
If you need clarification of what I mean, let me know.
Okay, Angela, John. Here you go: My reply to Angela. And Religion is bunk.
DeleteDon't hesitate to let me know if you need any clarification.
wre you born an asshole ,or did you work at it your whole life? either way it worked out great cause your an asshole now
DeleteAnd a nice big Fuck Ya! back at ya, Ya Lazy Prick!
DeleteWhat a doozy. Arrogant fucker.
Okay, here's a question for you, Angela:
ReplyDeleteWhy do I need to explain myself to you?
Because you demand that everyone explain themselves to you.
ReplyDeleteHey there, Angela!
ReplyDeleteLong time no whine.
Nah. I don't care if people explain themselves to me. And that's not exactly an answer to my question, by the way.